tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5739125502680107097.post4182249649236980922..comments2023-12-20T03:53:19.857-05:00Comments on Jost on Justice: Judging Roberts: Running Roughshod Over Precedent<b>Kenneth Jost</b>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08130278447396616546noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5739125502680107097.post-84619447846830176202010-09-20T13:00:12.124-04:002010-09-20T13:00:12.124-04:00This post does not claim that the liberals were an...This post does not claim that the liberals were any more true to precedent. And, if we are going to refer to Roe v. Wade as breaking 200 years of precedent and law, it is important to remember that the decision came down during the Burger Court with Blackmun, Burger, Stewart and Powell signing on to the majority.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5739125502680107097.post-67520884444497299232010-09-19T18:57:29.791-04:002010-09-19T18:57:29.791-04:00Wade broke 200 years of law and precedent.
It is...Wade broke 200 years of law and precedent. <br /><br />It is so incredibly obvious that liberals have no principles at all. If precedent favors the liberals than precedent is right, if precedent favors the conservatives then all of the sudden judicial activism is right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com