tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5739125502680107097.post7743024411511084714..comments2023-12-20T03:53:19.857-05:00Comments on Jost on Justice: Congress vs. Roberts Court on Voting Rights Act<b>Kenneth Jost</b>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08130278447396616546noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5739125502680107097.post-76673338799909397572012-06-01T09:18:24.228-04:002012-06-01T09:18:24.228-04:00So make your argument to Congress.So make your argument to Congress.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5739125502680107097.post-66971404712039080012012-05-31T10:38:36.032-04:002012-05-31T10:38:36.032-04:00Times have changed and the problem with the renewa...Times have changed and the problem with the renewal is that Congress didn't change the map and never really justified why that map from the 60s is still needed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5739125502680107097.post-41245537701465087562012-05-30T12:47:12.737-04:002012-05-30T12:47:12.737-04:00How could anyone who professes judicial restraint ...How could anyone who professes judicial restraint invalidate the Voting Rights Act? Section 2 of the Fifteenth Amendment states: "2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation." That would appear to give Congress plenary power to act, and the court should defer to Congress. If times have changed enough to eliminate the need for any such Shelterdoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09973906960864702661noreply@blogger.com